RETURN TO HOME PAGE BRADBURYS RESPONSE
LMUD AND THE GRAND JURY
"White Collar" Crime alive and well in Lassen County Private dishonesty of public Officials
KWH ASKS FOR
GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION for Criminal Negligence & Abuse of Discretion LINK
Judge Bradbury, presiding Judge of Lassen County Superior Court, turns request over to the Grand Jury. link Grand Jury totally ignores request
LMUD EMPLOYEE PLACED ON GRAND JURY LINK
The District Attorney gives the GREEN LIGHT
for white collar crime. Three words for the DA: Obstruction of Justice. Robert Burns is "off duty" when it comes to prosecuting LMUD directors.
grand jury formed by judge bradbury The new grand jury formed by Judge Bradbury included Steve Trevino, LMUD Electrical Superintendent. The past Grand Jury's have turned a blind eye to LMUD's wrong doings.
2002/2003 GRAND JURY LINK
THE BROWN ACT
Findings: The 2002/2003 Grand Jury noticed that none of the legislative bodies answered the 2001/2002 Grand Jury recommendations.
LINK THE 2000/2001 GRAND JURY TELLS LMUD TO LET THE PUBLIC SPEAK
LINK THE 2001/2002 GRAND JURY IS CONCERNED ABOUT BROWN ACT
LINK THE 2002/2003 GRAND JURY IS CONCERNED ABOUT BROWN ACT
Public Boards that restrict public input generally are hiding wrong doing. Public Boards that deny public records are generally hiding wrong doing.
Two members of the Grand Jury sat in on the January 7, 2004 LMUD meeting. This is what they witnessed:
1. LMUD was accused of publishing untrue statements in the Ruralite Magazine
2. LMUD was accused of blaming a member of KWH of sending documents to a federal agency under LMUD's name
3. LMUD closes the public meetings to the public on the publics business.
4. Wayne Langston is chastized for his ability not to make good decisions... (Langstons recent arrest)
5. Wayne Langston attempts to bring up an unagendized topic at the end of the meeting. (Langston wanted to schedule a special meeting prior to the hearing on the writ filed against LMUD for failing to disclose public documents)
WHAT THE GRAND JURY MEMBERS DID NOT SEE AT THE JANUARY MEETING.....
LANGSTON DID NOT GAVEL ANYONE ! LANGSTON DID NOT THREATEN ANYONE.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
ARROWROCK MONEY NEVER AUTHORIZED
LINK LANGSTON AND RICHARDS GIVE FALSE STATEMENT TO COVER UP SPENDING
***************************************************
Langston re-institutes gag policy May 8, 2003.
The Grand Jury told him, in 2001, let the public speak.
2002/2003 GRAND JURY
THE BROWN ACT
Findings: The 2002/2003 Grand Jury noticed that none of the legislative bodies answered the 2001/2002 Grand Jury recommendations.
LINK THE 2000/2001 GRAND JURY TELLS LMUD TO LET THE PUBLIC SPEAK
LINK THE 2001/2002 GRAND JURY IS CONCERNED ABOUT BROWN ACT
LINK THE 2002/2003 GRAND JURY IS CONCERNED ABOUT BROWN ACT
Public Boards that restrict public input generally are hiding wrong doing. Public Boards that deny public records are generally hiding wrong doing.
Why Allow Public Input...
Because......LMUD BELONGS TO THE RATEPAYERS